Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies

The Science Popularization Ecosystem Paradigm in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Futures Studies of Science and Technology, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D., Graduate in Sociology, Research Expert, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran

10.22034/jkrs.2025.20482

Abstract

Purpose: This study designs a paradigm for Iran’s science popularization ecosystem, providing a framework for fostering coherence, informing policy-making, and enabling operationalization at the national level. The ecosystem is conceptualized as a dynamic network of institutions, actors, resources, and interactions aimed at bridging the gap between science and society.
Methodology: A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing focus groups and document analysis as the primary methods.
Findlings: The proposed paradigm for Iran’s science popularization ecosystem is predicated on the dynamic interactions among four key components: internal, external, environmental, and institutional. Its implementation faces significant challenges, including conceptual ambiguity, institutional fragmentation, limited financial resources, a lack of indigenous models, low public science literacy, underutilization of media platforms, and the absence of a central coordinating body to regulate and synergize the activities of various stakeholders.
Conclusion: In the absence of a shared paradigm, science popularization efforts in Iran remain fragmented and ineffective. The proposed paradigm offers both conceptual and structural coherence, establishing a necessary foundation for effective policy formulation. Its impact, however, can only be realized upon its institutionalization as a common framework and through the collective participation of all relevant actors.
Value: This study provides a comprehensive theoretical and operational framework. It addresses a critical conceptual gap in the domain of science popularization in Iran and offers a substantive basis for future strategic planning and high-level policy development.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107. https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem
Barreto, J. O. M., Ellemers, N., Whittaker, A. C., & Bradley, B. (2024). Research evidence communication for policy-makers: A rapid scoping review on frameworks, guidance and tools, and barriers and facilitators. Health Research Policy and Systems, 22(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01169-9
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984.‏
https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
Borowiec, B. G. (2023). Ten simple rules for scientists engaging in science communication. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(7), e1011251. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011251
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/homo-academicus
Bowler, P. J. (2009). Science for all: The popularization of science in early twentieth-century Britain. University of Chicago Press. https://www.amazon.com/Science-All-Popularization-Twentieth-Century-Britain/dp/0226068633
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2008). Handbook of public communication of science and technology. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Public-Communication-of-Science-and-Technology/Bucchi-Trench/p/book/9780367702946
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262515962/acting-in-an-uncertain-world/
Cornelis, G. C. (1998). Is popularization of science possible? The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, 37, 30–33. https://philpapers.org/rec/CORIPO
Creswell, J. (n.d.). Qualitative research and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Shirzad Pashaei, Trans., 2013). Samt. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11132454/ [In Persian]
Druckman, J. N., Aitsi-Selmi, A., & Scheufele, D. A. (2025). An agenda for science communication research and practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(46), e2400932122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400932122
Edner, J. (2006). Innovation ecosystems and the role of government policy. Research Policy, 35(10), 1455–1469.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press. https://www.amazon.com/LEARNING-MUSEUMS-American-Association-History/dp/0742502953
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Qualitative-Research-Uwe-Flick/dp/1526445654
Fontaine, G., Maheu-Cadotte, M. A., Lavallée, A., Mailhot, T., Rouleau, G., Bouix-Picasso, J., & Bourbonnais, A. (2019). Communicating science in the digital and social media ecosystem: Scoping review and typology of strategies used by health scientists. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 5(3), e14447. https://doi.org/10.2196/14447
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter. https://www.amazon.com/Technology-Policy-Economic-Performance-Lessons/dp/0861879287
Ghadimi, A. (2009). Developing science promotion indicators (Research project report). National Research Institute for Science Policy. https://nrisp.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/339.pdf [In Persian]
Ghadimi, A. (2019). Developing a science promotion model in Iran. National Research Institute for Science Policy. https://B2n.ir/tu4728 [In Persian]
Ghadimi, A., & Hejazi, E. (2021). Science promotion model in Iran: An empirical study. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 27(1), 153–182. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_703023.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
Ghadimi, A., Hejazi, E., & Nazifkar, G. (2023). Science promotion ecosystem model in Iran. University Publishing Center. https://www.gisoom.com/book/44907162/ [In Persian]
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Indiana University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Science-Multicultural-Postcolonialisms-Feminisms-Epistemologies/dp/0253211565
Hassanzadeh, M. (2009). Assessment of science promotion tools and stakeholders in the Islamic Republic of Iran with the aim of identifying effective factors and providing solutions for efficiency and effectiveness of stakeholders. National Research Institute for Science Policy. https://nrisp.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/318-merged.pdf [In Persian]
Hassanzadeh, M. (2010). Studying the mechanisms of science and technology museums in promoting science in Iran. National Research Institute for Science Policy. https://nrisp.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/343-merged.pdf [In Persian]
Herati, K. (1999). The necessity of science promotion. National Research Institute for Science Policy. https://nrisp.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/54.pdf [In Persian]
Horton, R. (2022). The scientific communication ecosystem: The responsibility of investigators. The Lancet, 400(10357), 1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01898-0
Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., & Scheufele, D. A. (2025). Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(46), e2400928121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400928121
Kuhn, T. (n.d.). The structure of scientific revolutions (A. Taheri, Trans., 1962). Farhang-e No. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1961876/ [In Persian]
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications. https://www.amazon.com/Naturalistic-Inquiry-Yvonna-S-Lincoln/dp/0803924313
Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 242). Pinter: London.‏ https://www.amazon.com/National-Systems-Innovation-Interactive-Economics/dp/1843318822
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Harper Business. https://www.amazon.com/Death-Competition-Leadership-Strategy-Ecosystems/dp/0887308503
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press. https://www.amazon.com/Re-Thinking-Science-Knowledge-Public-Uncertainty/dp/0745626084
Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and society, 9(4).‏ https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/
Papanelopoulou, F., Nieto-Galan, A., & Perdiguero, E. (2009). Popularizing science and technology in the European periphery, 1800–2000. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Popularizing-Science-and-Technology-in-the-European-Periphery-1800-2000/Nieto-Galan-Papanelopoulou/p/book/9781138259843
Paya, A. (2008). Science promotion in society: A philosophical assessment. Science and Technology Policy, 1(1), 25–38. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12742.html  [In Persian]
Paya, A., & Vesali, M. (2008). Genealogy and foresight of science promotion and its role in knowledge-based development. National Research Institute for Science Policy. https://nrisp.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/331.pdf [In Persian]
Raza, G. (2009). Introduction: Mapping public understanding of science. Science Technology Society, 14, 211–220. http://sts.sagepub.com/content/14/2/211
Ren, F., & Zhai, J. (2013). Communication and popularization of science and technology in China. Springer. https://www.amazon.com/Communication-Popularization-Science-Technology-China/dp/3642395600
Vesali, M. (2007). National science promotion policies in G8, D8, India, and China. National Research Institute for Science Policy. https://nrisp.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/231-merged.pdf [In Persian]
Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies
Volume 4, Issue 4 - Serial Number 14
December 2025
Pages 80-101
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics