Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor,, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Razi University, Iran

2 Ph.D. in Knowledge and Information Science, Razi University, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and analyze the regulations governing top researchers in Iranian universities under the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology. The research focused on assessing the strengths and weaknesses of these regulations through a comparative and scoring methodology.
Methodology: The study utilized an applied research design and employed the library research method. The research population included the regulations governing the selection of top researchers from various universities affiliated with the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology for the academic year 2020-2021. Data collection involved an examination and compilation of these regulations. The research utilized convenience sampling, and evaluation and content analysis techniques were applied to analyze the data.
Findings: The findings revealed variations in the regulations governing the selection of top researchers across the studied universities. These regulations demonstrated differences in scoring methodologies and attention to detail, lacking a unified structure. Notable discrepancies were observed in the scoring of printed books, points distribution, assessment of guided dissertations, and evaluation of research projects.
Conclusion: The study concluded that there is no standardized criterion for selecting top researchers across Iranian universities affiliated with the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology. Consequently, the establishment of a unified framework with consistent rules for identifying outstanding researchers nationwide is deemed necessary. Such an initiative would ensure fair competition among researchers and emphasize the efficiency and practicality of their research as the criteria for superiority.
Value: This research contributes to the comparative examination of selection criteria for the top researchers in Iran, which is a relatively limited area of study.

Keywords

Chan, K. C., Chen, C. R., & Cheng, L. T. (2005). Ranking research productivity in accounting for Asia-Pacific universities. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting24, 47-64.‏ DOI:10.1007/s11156-005-5326-5
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. pearson.‏
Hagan, C. M., Konopaske, R., Bernardin, H. J., & Tyler, C. L. (2006). Predicting assessment center performance with 360-degree, top-down, and customer-based competency assessments. Human resource management, 45(3), 357-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20117
Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research policy12(2), 61-90.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7
Qaramelki, F.(2007, June 21). Our idea of research, Resalat newspaper, https://www.magiran.com/article/1421728
Boali Hamadan University.(2021). selecting the best researcher[Regulations]. Boali Hamadan University[In Persian].
Razi University of Kermanshah.( 2021). selecting the best researcher[Regulations]. Razi University of Kermanshah. [In Persian].
Kermanshah University of Technology.(2021). selecting the best researcher[Regulations]. Kermanshah University of Technology. https://www.kut.ac.ir/announcements/show/611-1400. [In Persian].
Kurdistan University.( 2021). selecting the best researcher[Regulations]. Kurdistan University. [In Persian].
Malayer University.( 2021). selecting the best researcher[Regulations]. Malayer University. [In Persian].
Ilam University.( 2014). selecting the best researcher[Regulations]. Ilam University. [In Persian].
Rezaei, M., & Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2015). The Identification and Accreditation of the Research Productivity Evaluation Indicators of Iran universities. Academic Librarianship and Information Research49(2), 213-237. doi: 10.22059/jlib.2015.56984.[In Persian].
Rigi, A. (2021). Assessing the quality of Iranian universities from a socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Social Sciences Ferdowsi University of Mashhad18(1), 220-193. doi: 10.22067/social.2022.71522.1057. [In Persian].
Vosough, F., Ahmadi, G., Hassanmoradi, N., & Mohammaddavoodi, A. (2021). Identifying the native dimensions, components and indicators of research performance evaluation in university (A case study: Islamic Azad University in Tehran). Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System14(1), 13-42. doi: 10.52547/MPES.14.1.13. [In Persian].