Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Theoretical Studies of Science, Technology and Innovation, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Candidate, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Educational sciences and psychology, Shahid Chameran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22034/jkrs.2025.20327

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify and analyze interdisciplinary and inter-institutional collaborations evident in research outputs.
Methodology: In terms of purpose, this research is classified as applied, and in terms of methodology, it is a scientometric study. The research population comprised articles published in 2022 and 2023 from fifty-seven journals across six fields: basic sciences, engineering, agriculture, humanities, veterinary medicine, and art and architecture. Data analysis was conducted using Excel, Ravar Matrix, UciNet, and VOSViewer software.
Findings: The predominant collaboration pattern was intradisciplinary, with interdisciplinary collaborations constituting a smaller proportion. The highest frequencies of interdisciplinary collaboration were observed in veterinary medicine between pathobiology and clinical sciences (30 instances), in art and architecture between visual and Islamic arts (44 instances), and in engineering between chemical and petroleum engineering (8 instances). The University of Tehran emerged as the central hub for collaboration across all fields.
Conclusion: The results indicate that while Iran possesses the capacity to develop interdisciplinary research, the absence of a supportive policy framework, a weak culture of cooperation, and the concentration of resources in a limited number of universities have impeded large-scale interdisciplinary interactions. This current institutional pattern hinders broader impact and the sustainability of collaborative research.
Value: The findings can inform higher education policymakers in designing support programs, formulating incentive policies, and establishing platforms to foster increased interdisciplinary and inter-institutional collaboration.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abrami, S., & Jafari, N. (2019). A distinction on diversity and impact of interdisciplinary research at interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, intradisciplinary, and cross-disciplinary levels with a focus on inter- and intra-departmental collaborations in basic sciences. Scientometrics Research Letter, 5(2), 23–44. http://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.4118.1266 [In Persian]
Bellanca, L. (2009). Measuring interdisciplinary research: analysis of co-authorship for research staff at the University of York. Bioscience Horizons , 2 (2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/biohorizons/hzp012  
Bohrani, M. (2013). Discipline, interdiscipline, and the classification of sciences. Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(2), 3–59. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2014.18.003 [In Persian]
Bouabid, H., Dalimi, M., & Cherraj, M. (2013, July). Intermediate-class university ranking system: Application to Maghreb universities. In Fourteenth International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) Conference, Vienna. 15-19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268811052_Intermediate-class_university_ranking_system_Application_to_maghreb_universities_RIP
Dabbaghi, H., & Nourbakhsh, Y. (2021). Strategic principles for managing interdisciplinarity in the university system. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Arts, and Humanities, 1(2), 249–276. http://doi.org/10.22077/islah.2022.5056.1078 [In Persian]
De Stefano, D., Fuccella, V., Vitale, M. P., & Zaccarin, S. (2013). The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance. Social Networks, 35(3), 370-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.004
De Stefano, D., Fuccella, V., Vitale, M. P., & Zaccarin, S. (2013). The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance. Social Networks, 35(3), 370-381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.004
Erfanmanesh, M. A., & Morovvati Ardakani, M. (2016). Scientometric study and analysis of scientific collaboration networks in the Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities. Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(4), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2016.230 [In Persian]
Gogonani, A. (2025). A review of interdisciplinary-based curriculum studies and its impact on student skill development: A systematic review. Payashahr Monthly, 74(7), 1–7. https://civilica.com/doc/2265400/ [In Persian]
Jafari Naeini, S., Ghaane, M. R., & Boostani, R. (2021). Interdisciplinary interaction in biomedical engineering over the past two decades. Scientometrics Research Letter, 7(2), 273–296. http://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.5717.1419 [In Persian]
Jawad , Y. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Interdisciplinary Research. Journal of Global Economics, 11(5), 1-2. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/bibliometric-analysis-of-interdisciplinary-research-102942.html
Lebow, R. N. (1988). Interdisciplinary Research and the Future of Peace and Security Studies. Political Psychology, 9(3), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791727
Nemati, Sh., & Atapour, H. (2019). Mapping the scientific structure of articles in the field of exceptional children indexed in Web of Science: A specialized interdisciplinary study. New Psychological Researches, 14(56), 293–319. https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9902.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
Newell, W. H. (2013). The State of the Field: Interdisciplinary Theory. Issues In interdisciplinary studies31, 22-43. http://hdl.handle.net/10323/4478
Newman, J. (2024). Promoting interdisciplinary research collaboration: A systematic review, a critical literature review, and a pathway forward. Social Epistemology , 38 (2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2172694
Pessoa Junior, G. J., Dias, T. M., Silva, T. H., & Laender, A. H. (2020). On interdisciplinary collaborations in scientific coauthorship networks: the case of the Brazilian community. Scientometrics , 124 (3), 2341-2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03605-3
Pourkarimi Daranjani, Z., Golini Moghaddam, G., & Jalali Dizaji, A. (2016). Analysis of collaboration levels among Iranian researchers in the Web of Science database: A case study in social sciences. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 3(9), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2017.15975.1109 [In Persian]
Proctor, R. & Vu, K. (2019). How psychologists help solve real-world problems in multidisciplinary research teams: introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000458
Szostak, R. Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. Journal of documentation, 64(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810867551  
Tang, Q., Xu, W., Zhang, F., Yuan, G., & Zhou, D. (2025). Interdisciplinary research on periodontitis and depression: a bibliometric analysis of research trends, hotspots and future directions. Frontiers in Oral Health , 6 , 1588737. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1588737
Youngblood, M., & Lahti, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the interdisciplinary field of cultural evolution. Palgrave Communications , 4 (1), 1-9. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0175-8