Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Knowledge and Information science department, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the readiness of Iranian English language journals of technical and engineering for indexing in international citation databases
Methodology: This research is applied in term of purpose and descriptive-survey in term of data collection method. The population of study is those Iranian English-language journals in the technical and engineering field which are not indexed in Web of Science and Scopus Databases. The number of these journals is equal to 57.
Findings: The findings of the research showed that out of 57 studied journals, only 9 journals did not provide printed or electronic International Standard Serial Number. Also, 61.40 percent (35 cases) of the journals had delays in the publication of the journal issues. All the journals had peer-review process. Regarding policy criteria, 6 journals did not have geographical diversity in term of contributing authors and 2 journals did not have international editorial boards. In terms of access criteria, 8 journals did not have a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for articles and 2 journals did not provide the possibility of getting Endnote output for journal articles, and the rest of the criteria were met by all journals. In terms of position criteria, 14 journals did not have a profile in Google Scholar, and therefore their H-index and received citations were not available.
Conclusion: An important weakness of most engineering journals was the delay in the publication of journal issues. A relatively favorable situation was observed in the rest of the criteria.

Keywords

Bagherian, N. (2018). An Evaluation of the Websites of Scientific Journals of Philosophy based on Indexing Standards of International Information and Citation Databases. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 20(1), 203-225. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2018.3055.1862.
Dinkel, A., Berth, H., Borkenhagen, A., & Brähler, E. (2004). On raising the international dissemination of German research: Does changing publication language to English attract foreign authors to publish in a German basic psychology research journal?. Experimental psychology, 51(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.319
Duncombe, D. (2015, August 15). How to add local journals to international databases. The 2nd Asian Science Editors Conference& Workshop.Vietnam. https://asianeditor.org/event/2015/index.php
Kim, H. (2015, August 15). How to index journal in Scopus & WoS. The 2nd Asian Science editors’ conferences and workshop. vietnam. https://asianeditor.org/event/2015/index.php
Koch, T. ,& Vanderstraeten, R. (2021). Journal editors and journal indexes: Internationalization pressures in the semi-periphery of the world of science. Learned Publishing, 34(4),519-527. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1390.
 
Shahmirzadi, T. (2019). Adaptation of the Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) scientific journals structure with Scopus Indexing Criteria. Agricultural Information Sciences and Technology, 2(1),1-18.  10.22092/AISTJ.2019.126177.1026
Shin, E., Choi, H., & Seo, T. (2015). Internationalization of Domestic Journals for Enhancing the Global Influence: An Analysis on KoreaScience Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.159
Testa, J. (2009). The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. Transnational Corporations Review, 1(4),59–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2009.11658213
Winarko, B., Abrizah, A., & Tahira, M. (2016). An assessment of quality trustworthiness and usability of indonesian agricultural science journals: Stated preference versus revealed preference study. Scientometrics, 108(1),289-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1970-x