Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author) samiei@atu.ac.ir
2 Master of Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Departmernt of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Purpose: This research investigated the overlap between bibliographical records in the manuscripts database of Abdulazim library with Iran Marc standard.
Methodology: The methodology of this research is the descriptive- survey method, and used a combination method of study and review literature. For the research aim, is chosen 100 title manuscripts that were the same in the manuscripts database of Abdulazim library and the manuscripts database of the national library of Iran. For data gathering used checklist. Cheklist had 2 sections including bibliographical features and manuscript features. Data was collected by direct observation method, then these were surveyed and compared.
Findings: Findings showed, the manuscripts database of Abdulazim library didn’t consider some manuscript features such as leaf size, donated notes, consideration, and adornments, and this is a weak point for the Abdulazim library. In comparison this database described bibliographical features thoroughly. Most overlap between Abdulazim database and, IRANMARC fields assigned adornment of manuscripts, consideration, cover size, type of cover, number of leaves, donate note, type of chirography, the place that book was written, scribe, annotation, adornment of cover, complete/ incomplete, possession and etc. Most overlap between libraries in the description of bibliographical features assigned original title, subject, date of writing, language, number of manuscripts, introduce of the manuscript.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the Abdulazim library database has performed well in describing the bibliography section and has been able to complete the main fields related to the author, main title, etc., By the standard rules of the Iranian brand. The description of the bibliographic characteristics of the manuscripts has performed poorly, and only one field is used to mention the appearance characteristics of the manuscripts.
Value: The present study is the first to identify the differences in the description and cataloging of the manuscripts of the Astan library of Hazrat Abdul Azim with the standard cataloging rules of the Iranian MARC (manuscript).
Keywords
)