Document Type : Original Article

Author

Master in Knowledge and Information Science

Abstract

Purpose: explaining the components of access based on one of the dimensions fundamental change theory in the process of seeking information students in virtual space.

Method: The present study is a qualitative using semi-structured interviews. Population consist of BA students in education and psychology Faculty of university of Tabriz, selected using snowball sampling. Finally, using the opinions of 21 students, required data came to the saturation. To analyze qualitative data and extract components from the method of coding the grounded theory and MaxQDA software used.
Findings :To design access model and to discover a common concept of the definition of the phenomenon in question (access), considering causal conditions (context of using the knowledge and ability of others and types of content used in virtual space), contextual variables (access tools), strategies (how to access information resources, having the necessary skills to use information resources independently, using the knowledge and abilities of others in virtual space), intervening conditions (barriers to accessing information) and consequences of access (application of virtual space for users) was explained.
Value: The value of this research is to show one of the important dimensions of the theory of fundamental change (access) that is affected by the virtual environment.

Conclusion: The emergence of electronic resources in virtual space and the unique features of virtual space have changed the information-seeking behavior of students, and need to have necessary abilities and skills in the field of information literacy, computer literacy, Internet literacy, communication literacy, critical literacy, and culture literacy.

Keywords

Chen, H.y. & Chang, C.Y. (2005). Personal Epistemological Beliefs, Critical Thinking Abilities, and Information-Seeking Behavior of College Students. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1836-1840). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 31, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/20343/.
Dresang, E. T. (2005). The information-seeking behavior of youth in the digital environment. Library Trends, 54(2), 178-196. doi: 10.1353/lib.2006.0015
Harizavi, M., Zare-Deris, Z., Mahidashti, M., Abaft, N., Valipour, A., & Momtazan, M. Factors affecting information behavior behaviors of Abadan University of Medical Sciences students. Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences, 6 (1) :37-43 https://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jmis.6.1.38
Khosrawi, F, Mansourian, Y Alipour Hafezi, M & Ali Mohammadi, D (2008). The Effect of Electronic Resources on Study. Book of the Months of General, 8 (128).
Koh, K. (2011). Proposing a Theoretical Framework for Digital Age Youth Information Behavior Building upon Radical Change Theory. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2849
Koh, K. (2013). Theory-to-research-to-theory strategy: A research-based expansion of radical change theory. Library & Information Science Research, 35(1), 33-40. doi:10.1016/J.LISR.2012.09.003
Koh, K. (2015). Radical Change Theory: Framework for Empowering Digital Youth. Retrieved from https://b2n.ir/d19003
Saaid, S. A., & Abd Wahab, Z. (2014). The impact of digital-based materials on undergraduates' reading habit. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity4(3), 249. doi: 10.7763/IJSSH.2014.V4.357
 Shabani, A., F. NaderiKharaji, M. R. Abedi (2012). Reading Behavior of Graduate Students in Digital Environment at University of Isfahan through 2008-2009: A Case Study. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 10(1), 1-14.
Weber, H., Becker, D., & Hillmert, S. (2019). Information-seeking behaviour and academic success in higher education: Which search strategies matter for grade differences among university students and how does this relevance differ by field of study? Higher Education77(4), 657-678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0296-4