نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Assistant Professor in Sport Management, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

2 Master student in Sport Management,Un iversity of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of LIS, University of Birjand

چکیده

Purpose: This study provides a scientometric overview of Sport Management research, with particular emphasis on the thematic structure and keyword dynamics of the field.
Methodology: A keyword‑based strategy was employed for data collection using the terms “sport management” and “sports management” within the titles or keywords of publications. A total of 5,743 English‑language articles were retrieved from the Scopus database. Following data cleaning and normalization, the dataset was analyzed using advanced scientometric tools. The study examines the overall scientometric profile of the field, including temporal trends, citation patterns, and domain distribution, as well as thematic development within sport management literature. VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix R package were used to perform keyword analysis, co‑occurrence mapping, and thematic clustering.
Findings: The results identify eight major thematic domains within sport management research: Organizational Strategy and Technological Integration; Athlete Health and Injury Management; Athlete Performance and Sport Psychology; Governance, Safety, and Health Policy; Sustainable Sport Event Management; Social Equity and Inclusion in Sport; Sport Tourism and Environmental Sustainability; and Participant Motivation and Volunteerism. Several of these domains exhibit notable thematic overlap, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field.
Conclusion: The findings indicate a gradual shift in sport management research from traditional foundational themes toward technology‑oriented topics, including the use of big data and machine learning in sport management contexts.
Value: These findings provide insights for future research while expanding the understanding of sport management. By offering an evidence‑based overview of thematic developments, the study provides academics, practitioners, and policymakers with a foundation to guide future developments and strategic decision‑making.
Keywords: Sport Management, Sports Management, Scientometric Analysis, Thematic Evolution, Keyword Trends, Concept Mapping

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Mapping Key Concepts and Thematic Development in Sports Management: A Scientometric Perspective

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Sahebkaran 1
  • Fatheme Taherinasab 2
  • Mahmoud Sangari 3

1 Assistant Professor in Sport Management, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

2 Master student in sport Management, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of LIS, University of Birjand

چکیده [English]

Purpose: This study provides a scientometric overview of Sport Management research, with particular emphasis on the thematic structure and keyword dynamics of the field.
Methodology: A keyword‑based strategy was employed for data collection using the terms “sport management” and “sports management” within the titles or keywords of publications. A total of 5,743 English‑language articles were retrieved from the Scopus database. Following data cleaning and normalization, the dataset was analyzed using advanced scientometric tools. The study examines the overall scientometric profile of the field, including temporal trends, citation patterns, and domain distribution, as well as thematic development within sport management literature. VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix R package were used to perform keyword analysis, co‑occurrence mapping, and thematic clustering.
Findings: The results identify eight major thematic domains within sport management research: Organizational Strategy and Technological Integration; Athlete Health and Injury Management; Athlete Performance and Sport Psychology; Governance, Safety, and Health Policy; Sustainable Sport Event Management; Social Equity and Inclusion in Sport; Sport Tourism and Environmental Sustainability; and Participant Motivation and Volunteerism. Several of these domains exhibit notable thematic overlap, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field.
Conclusion: The findings indicate a gradual shift in sport management research from traditional foundational themes toward technology‑oriented topics, including the use of big data and machine learning in sport management contexts.
Value: These findings provide insights for future research while expanding the understanding of sport management. By offering an evidence‑based overview of thematic developments, the study provides academics, practitioners, and policymakers with a foundation to guide future developments and strategic decision‑making.
Keywords: Sport Management, Sports Management, Scientometric Analysis, Thematic Evolution, Keyword Trends, Concept Mapping

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sports Management
  • Scientometric Analysis
  • Thematic Evolution
  • Keyword Trends
  • Concept Mapping
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R‑tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Ciomaga, B. (2013). Sport management: A bibliometric study on central themes and trends. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(5), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2013.838283
Cobo, M. J., López‑Herrera, A. G., Herrera‑Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011a). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011b). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Doherty, A. (2013). “It takes a village”: Interdisciplinary research for sport management. Journal of Sport Management, 27(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.27.1.1
Elahi, A. R., Gholampour, S., & Gholampour, B. (2019). A scientometric study of the Journal of Applied Research of Sport Management. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 6(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.22088/cjs.6.2.24
Funk, D. C. (2019). Spreading research uncomfortably slow: Insight for emerging sport management scholars. Journal of Sport Management, 33(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0315
Gholampour, S., Noruzi, A., Gholampour, B., & Elahi, A. (2019). Research trends and bibliometric analysis of a journal: Sport Management Review. Webology, 16(2).
Hammerschmidt, J., Calabuig, F., Kraus, S., & Uhrich, S. (2024). Tracing the state of sport management research: A bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 74(2), 1185–1208.
Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics52(2), 291-314.
Lachance, E. L., et al. (2023). Sport management or the management of sport? Reframing the theory debate. Sport Management Review, 27(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2023.2243109
Miller, J., Pierce, D., Gregg, E., & Price, B. (2025). A content analysis of the Sport Management Education Journal: 2007–2023. Sport Management Education Journal, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0012
Nalimov, V. V., & Mul'čenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometrija: izučenie razvitija nauki kak informacionnogo processa. Nauka.
Perianes‑Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
Pritchard, A. (1969), Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?, Journal of Documentation, 25, 348–349.
Shilbury, D. (2011). A bibliometric study of citations to sport management and marketing journals. Journal of Sport Management, 25(5), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.25.5.423
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2020). Scientometrics for the humanities and social sciences. Routledge.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Varea‑Calero, A. D., Rejón‑Guardia, F., Ramírez‑Hurtado, J. M., & Berbel‑Pineda, J. M. (2025). Impact and development of sport sponsorship: A three‑decade bibliometric analysis (1993–2024). Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 176–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-09-2024-0134
Weingart, S. B. (2015). Finding the history and philosophy of science. Erkenntnis, 80(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9621-1